News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The promise of static typing.

Re:The promise of static typing by itsdrewmiller on Thursday May 19, 2016 @04:28PM (#11733519)
Does anyone know what unit is being used for the x axis on these charts?

Edit: Figured it out (total bugs / repo). Seems like controlling for overall project size is an important missing component of this analysis.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The promise of static typing by egwynn on Thursday May 19, 2016 @06:29PM (#11734380)
Agreed. I think (bugs/LOC) could even work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The promise of static typing by gdwatson on Thursday May 19, 2016 @06:47PM (#11734456)
That might be better, but it would still be misleading. "Denser" languages would have more bugs per line, but also fewer lines per program.

I've never used APL and wouldn't want to debug it, but its bug-to-line ratio could be much higher than Java and still come out ahead in practice.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The promise of static typing by rbanffy on Thursday May 19, 2016 @08:21PM (#11734870)
APL is considered by many a write-only language.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The promise of static typing by rbanffy on Thursday May 19, 2016 @08:21PM (#11734867)
> Seems like controlling for overall project size is an important missing component of this analysis.

That would bias the numbers against more concise languages.

[ Parent | on HN ]