News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Git Reflow by bennofs on Thursday May 19, 2016 @03:08PM (#11732827)
Doesn't `git blame --first-parent` work for that? From my quick tests, it seems like it shows the merge commit if you have such a structure (`--first-parent` also works for `git log` etc)
Re:Git Reflow by juped on Thursday May 19, 2016 @03:48PM (#11733174)
Totally does (though your maintainer has to care about first-parentage order, which they should, and which should be enforced by the software but isn't - see Junio's blogpost "fun with non-fast-forward", or "fun with --first-parent" for more basic info)
Re:Git Reflow by gsylvie on Thursday May 19, 2016 @08:48PM (#11734949)
And this: http://bit-booster.blogspot.ca/2016/02/no-foxtrots-allowed.h...

(p.s. your old comment on "git branching models" that starts "Not another one. All good git workflows are different..." was hilarious/awesome - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11193048.)

Re:Git Reflow by juped on Thursday May 19, 2016 @10:26PM (#11735230)
Thanks. Git superstitions bug me a lot because it shouldn't have to be this way.
Re:Git Reflow by sergiosgc on Thursday May 19, 2016 @09:05PM (#11735008)
Thanks! It does. Learning something everyday.