News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS X1 instances – 1.9 TB of memory by 0xfaded on Wednesday May 18, 2016 @02:10PM (#11724251)
mmap is not "a lot of extra work".
Re:AWS X1 instances – 1.9 TB of memory by sievebrain on Wednesday May 18, 2016 @07:58PM (#11726997)
You're assuming the dataset is a file you can just mmap there. If it's more complex (built up from a network feed or something) then yes, there is more work involved than just an mmap call, coordinating shm segments is not zero complexity.

But the real impact is if you want to be mutating that data set. The default behaviour of "tear down the entire process on error" can of course be worked around even if you ignore data corruption errors, but not having to do things by hand is the point of managed runtimes in the first place.

Re:AWS X1 instances – 1.9 TB of memory by icedchai on Wednesday May 18, 2016 @06:03PM (#11726361)
Hah. You'd be surprised how few developers actually know that shared memory exists.