News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pilot-Wave Theory Gains Experimental Support by int_19h on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:09PM (#11717935)
>> Replace non-locality with infinite universes, which is more troubling

It's a question to the philosophers, not the scientists. There is no objective measurement for what "troubling" is.

And if we don't start with any preconceived notions of how things _should_ work, then discovering that they work differently is not particularly troubling.

Re:Pilot-Wave Theory Gains Experimental Support by matt_kantor on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @10:32PM (#11719326)
> It's a question to the philosophers, not the scientists.

As discussed upthread, this is all philosophy. The popular interpretations of quantum mechanics are all experimentally equivalent, so we need to use elegance, intuitiveness, troubling-ness, etc to choose between them (and these can be highly personal).

EDIT: After re-reading your comment I think I'm agreeing with you here.

Re:Pilot-Wave Theory Gains Experimental Support by eru on Friday May 20, 2016 @12:47AM (#11735598)
You can also use the `operational non-interpretation', and just use the math to calculate without worrying about what it `means'.

(That's pretty close to the spirit of the Copenhagen interpretation, though.)