News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One year of Rust by kzrdude on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @05:38PM (#11717696)
You're overstating the stability guarantees. The Rust project has formulated it as “hassle-free upgrades” which seems to imply that small, simple edits may be necessary when upgrading to a new Rust version.
Re:One year of Rust by steveklabnik on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @07:42PM (#11718551)
That's only for changes that are important, though: we don't make unnecessary changes.
Re:One year of Rust by kzrdude on Thursday May 19, 2016 @02:07AM (#11728338)
Agree. It's important to underscore what was promised and what was not. Otherwise you might get the impression that a promise was broken (when it was not).