The threat of newspeak is that it can render concepts unspeakable. Orwell advocated using words better. A simple word that bears the right meaning is better than a complex word that has nuance, but in having nuance is flabby. He complains in particular that "prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated hen-house." He claims that there is political intent behind the trendy language of the day. He's probably right. I will walk out of the conference room the next time someone tells me to "drill down" or "circle back" or "touch base". I'll do it for Orwell.

Think of it as a cargo cult of language; play-acting at meaning-saying: Language wielded like a ritual dagger instead of a tool.

You can recognize some examples of what he'd complain about if you pay attention to that sense. I'm annoyed by lots of uses of English; I must be fun to be around. I can't say they're misuses, but i dislike them. My favorite might be "I would argue", followed by... the author making an argument? Why the distancing? It's a verbal tick. It creates an air of passivity or detachment which is immediately contradicted by the words that follow. I suppose there's an idea these days that being detached and emotionless confers objectivity and wisdom, but I can't say i know at all for certain why people write or speak the way they do.

Language should stick to meaning like muscle to bone.

http://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit...