News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Employment, construction, and the cost of San Francisco apartments. Parent comment

Re:Employment, construction, and the cost of San Francisco a... by bane on Monday May 16, 2016 @10:50PM (#11711101)
By way of comparison, out here on the East Coast, I went by my county office on a Friday, talked over what I wanted to do with the clerk, sketched out a basic plan on a blank sheet of paper, paid $75 in fees, taped the permit to my front window and started work on an expansion the next day.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Employment, construction, and the cost of San Francisco a... by lyqwyd on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @01:52AM (#11711571)
Yes, SF's process is incredibly broken. It's not just that they are too expensive and time consuming (which they are!), it's also that the rules are arbitrary, and there are multiple departments, which often have the exact opposite requirements.

Additionally, any approval can be appealed by neighbors for any reason, at very little cost, but then the person applying for the permit will then have to spend thousands more, and potentially years more, to fight the appeal.

The uncertainty and lack of clear rules is actually worse than the cost (which is ridiculous).

I find it hard to imagine a more dysfunctional planning process.

[ Parent | on HN ]