News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stoned drivers are safer than drunk ones, new federal dat... by nostrebored on Monday May 16, 2016 @10:14PM (#11710966)
You're very rarely forced to do anything in life. My family has been in small farm agriculture for multiple generations.

Coincidentally they don't smoke pot and drive, because they're not inconsiderate, life endangering assholes.

My point still stands, that if you choose to take treatment that impairs your ability to drive, then you shouldn't drive. If driving is important to you, you should choose other treatment if you can. If you can't, then you shouldn't drive.

Re:Stoned drivers are safer than drunk ones, new federal dat... by MAGZine on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @01:51AM (#11711567)
> You're very rarely forced to do anything in life. My family has been in small farm agriculture for multiple generations.

> Coincidentally they don't smoke pot and drive, because they're not inconsiderate, life endangering assholes.

Then there's a good chance that they consume liquor and get behind the wheel instead. I know a lot of farmers, and this is a pretty universal truism.

Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything but people generally don't feel compelled to uproot their lives/livelihood because someone far away is trying to tell them what's good for them. Because especially in farm communities, drinking and driving is most likely to cause endangerment to yourself, not others. Not much to hit on grid roads.