News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte... by r00fus on Monday May 16, 2016 @07:50PM (#11710463)
oblig: s/affect/effect/

Still I think the 140 character limit was in part due to their continued success; I know when I look at a tweet, I'm not going to get a 1000-word dissertatino on a subject - I will get bite-size pieces of info (for the most part, except for the multi-part diatribes or conversations, which I generally ignore).

Link anxiety is a real thing - I'm less likely to click if it's going to absorb my attention for 5m+.

Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte... by frank_jaeger on Monday May 16, 2016 @09:49PM (#11710867)
oblig pointing out of incorrect oblig correction. network effect[0] is absolutely correct.

edit: for the downvotes- [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte... by r00fus on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @12:41AM (#11711380)
parent made an edit from affect to effect, so I guess my recommendation was taken to heart :)
Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte... by oneeyedpigeon on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @04:11AM (#11711985)
Fair point though, it's confusing. Can't you edit your post and remove the correction now that it's irrelevant? And then we can delete this entire unnecessary subthread :)
Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte... by return0 on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:56AM (#11712528)
Honestly, i didn't. I guess you misread. Besides, i wouldn't be able to edit my comment an hour later.