Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte...
by frank_jaeger on Monday May 16, 2016 @09:49PM
(#11710867)
oblig pointing out of incorrect oblig correction. network effect[0] is absolutely correct.
edit: for the downvotes- [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect
Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte...
by r00fus on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @12:41AM
(#11711380)
parent made an edit from affect to effect, so I guess my recommendation was taken to heart :)
Re:Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Characte...
by oneeyedpigeon on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @04:11AM
(#11711985)
Fair point though, it's confusing. Can't you edit your post and remove the correction now that it's irrelevant? And then we can delete this entire unnecessary subthread :)
Still I think the 140 character limit was in part due to their continued success; I know when I look at a tweet, I'm not going to get a 1000-word dissertatino on a subject - I will get bite-size pieces of info (for the most part, except for the multi-part diatribes or conversations, which I generally ignore).
Link anxiety is a real thing - I'm less likely to click if it's going to absorb my attention for 5m+.