News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UC students suit claims Google scanned accounts without p... by upofadown on Sunday May 15, 2016 @02:37PM (#11702117)
That statement from Google would only be a lie if the students were getting ads. The article says the complaint is that "the firm harvested their data for commercial gain without their consent". I could not determine from the article exactly what harvesting was done or what commercial gain derived from that.

Google has maintained that the email scanning for targeted advertising is not a privacy issue in that it is automated and there are no details leaked outside the system. If it turned out that the scanning was done and no actions resulted from that then the whole thing would become philosophical.

Re:UC students suit claims Google scanned accounts without p... by gunshigh on Sunday May 15, 2016 @02:41PM (#11702132)
They lied because they claimed the emails weren't being scanned:

"which means your school's content is not processed by Google's advertising systems"

Re:UC students suit claims Google scanned accounts without p... by Filligree on Sunday May 15, 2016 @02:46PM (#11702147)
Perhaps it was being scanned by a different system which is not part of the advertisement systems?
Re:UC students suit claims Google scanned accounts without p... by upofadown on Sunday May 15, 2016 @02:59PM (#11702217)
What does "processed" mean in this context? Can an advertising system which produces no advertising be considered to have processed anything?