Re:Tell HN: U.S. gov't blacklisted all DNS entries pointing ...
by metamemetics on Friday March 05, 2010 @05:54PM
(#1170707)
http://blog.linode.com/2010/01/15/linode-and-the-google-cybe...
"No Linodes were involved in malicious activity related to this event. In fact, it was Google itself that chose to use Linode to aid in their investigation of the attacks"
Re:Tell HN: U.S. gov't blacklisted all DNS entries pointing ...
by ig1 on Sunday March 07, 2010 @07:51PM
(#1174370)
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-055A.html suggests otherwise.
Re:Tell HN: U.S. gov't blacklisted all DNS entries pointing ...
by MrHyde on Monday March 08, 2010 @01:17PM
(#1175945)
So, McAfee identifies a single node as "associated" with the incident: li107-40[dot]members[dot]linode[dot]com. And Linode has a post which specifically references a single node being associated but under Google's control and not malicious control at all times.
Doesn't appear to me that there's any contradiction. There is no evidence that a Linode was used for anything malicious. There is evidence that a Linode was used.
Reading this sentence, reminded me of Google using Linode when that incident happened with Chinese hackers.