Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L...
by kamkha on Thursday May 12, 2016 @04:18PM
(#11686427)
spaCy's 96.8% accuracy is for the task of POS tagging while Google's reported 94% accuracy is for dependency parsing, a significantly harder problem.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L...
by weinzierl on Thursday May 12, 2016 @04:31PM
(#11686539)
Thanks (also to charlieegan3) this explains the difference nicely.
Actually I found an educational 500 lines python parser from the same author as well [1]. It claims an accuracy of 92.7 for the WSJ corpus.
Re:Announcing SyntaxNet: The World’s Most Accurate Natural L...
by xigency on Thursday May 12, 2016 @04:22PM
(#11686467)
Well, it seems this page could use some work: http://www.aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?title=Dependency_Par...