News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Entanglement Made Simple by cousin_it on Thursday May 12, 2016 @09:59AM (#11683378)
They are not equivalent. The former term logically implies the latter term. That means the set of situations described by the former term is a subset of the situations described by the latter term. That means the probability of the former set should be less or equal than the probability of the latter set.
Re:Entanglement Made Simple by mh-cx on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:14AM (#11683495)
Ah, makes sense now. Thanks!

Now I also get your previous comment. I've read your => as arrows instead of "equal or greater".

Re:Entanglement Made Simple by cousin_it on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:39AM (#11683705)
They are arrows, logical implications :-)
Re:Entanglement Made Simple by mh-cx on Thursday May 12, 2016 @10:49AM (#11683790)
Argh. Right. After more thinking equal or greater than wouldn't make much sense.