Re:Concerns for global spread of Zika mean Rio de Janeiro Ol...
by wrsh07 on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @09:27PM
(#11680724)
Right, over the whole year not so substantial. Assuming an even distribution of tourism per month (false, but I lack a better model), that's about 500,000 per month. This is essentially doubling the tourism during the events.
As the article says, sending tourists into an outbreak of a new virus does not seem prudent.
As the article says, sending tourists into an outbreak of a new virus does not seem prudent.