Introducing unlimited private repositories

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by fps on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @02:31PM (#11677918)

the software is AGPLv3'd, and run by hundreds of educational organizations around the world. Those organizations typically contribute changes back via Github. Non-employees don't contribute to our private repositories. We gain quite a bit from maintaining a large open source community, but it's not "free labor."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by sequoia on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:40PM (#11678561)

I apologize- I thought volunteers were contributing to your private repos. If I understand correctly, your issue is that you have (say) 10 employees accessing private repos and 100 contributors to public/Free ones, but you're to be charged for all users you add to your org? I can see how this would be frustrating.

I see two possible solutions that don't force you to switch vendors:

1. Have non-employees fork & submit pull requests. 2. Split your private stuff off to a different org & formally separate free stuff from proprietary, make the free stuff community managed.

If these are problems, I'd maintain that this is a "have your cake and eat it to" problem, on the one hand keeping ownership & control of the project and reaping the attendant benefit to the edx brand, and on the other hand getting people to hack on your stuff for free. But in any event this is a broader existential issue that exists across the OSS world right now (see express.js), so I'm probably reading too much into your case. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by mjlee on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:34PM (#11678511)

From the announcement:

"These users do not fill a seat:

Outside collaborators with access to only public repositories"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by fps on Thursday May 12, 2016 @08:33AM (#11682866)

Ah, I didn't see that part of the announcement at all. That makes the new pricing much closer to what we were paying before. Thanks for pointing it out!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by sequoia on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @04:05PM (#11678775)

oh yeah. That's probably why I assumed "collaborators" must have had access to private edx repos.

[ Parent | on HN ]