Re:Trump-Sanders Signal an Oligarchy on the Brink of Collapse
by whyenot on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @09:27AM
(#11675017)
In Limbaugh's lexicon, feminists turned into "feminazis" because advocating for equal rights for women was somehow equatable to a group advocating genocide.
Re:Trump-Sanders Signal an Oligarchy on the Brink of Collapse
by smoyer on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @08:58AM
(#11674824)
Early in his career, Rush Limbaugh was funny and made political news worth listening to. Yes, he was heavily biased towards the right.
Later (when Clinton won the Whitehouse in '92), he became bitter and hateful ... I stopped listening to him when I realized that hearing that content for three hours a day (while at work) was making me bitter and hateful too.
As an aside, the eight years of the Clinton presidency look pretty good compared to the last 16 years.
Re:Trump-Sanders Signal an Oligarchy on the Brink of Collapse
by josho on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @10:42AM
(#11675730)
As your neighbour to the north you make it sound like the Republican party has fractured into two groups. Those that are conservative (the Buckley Republicans in your example), and those ignorant masses that respond to jingoist and politico-entertainment rather than well thought out political debate. (I'm shocked that anyone would label them self a dittohead, implying that they have no independent thought, rather in my mind's eye that is a hurtful label that I'd reserve only for my worst enemy).
From what I've observed in this election cycle I can't disagree with your assessment, though I am deeply saddened at this realization.
Re:Trump-Sanders Signal an Oligarchy on the Brink of Collapse
by a_c_s on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @10:02AM
(#11675331)
For now though the Republican party controls congress and in 30 states[1] they control both legislative houses and the governorship: for a party that is 'falling apart' they are doing much better than the Democrats.
[1] https://ballotpedia.org/Gubernatorial_and_legislative_party_...
Then Limbaugh came along, never referencing anything he said or wrote, constantly contradicting himself and making offensive cracks like calling a 12-year-old Chelsea Clinton the White House dog. My young Republican friends loved him, chanted slogans like "Rush is Right!" and labeled themselves "dittoheads." Anyone who pointed out Limbaugh's contradictory logic or took issue with his offensive statements was dismissed as being "politically correct."
Flash forward 25 years and Limbaugh is now considered tame in comparison to Coulter, Savage, and some of the other voices that have followed in his footsteps. I was sad to hear that William Buckley, who I still admire intellectually even if many of his positions are anathema to me, was largely forgotten and ignored in his final years. Trump's nomination would not be possible without Limbaugh laying the groundwork for him two and a half decades ago.
Some on the left are gloating about it, but it frightens me. America needs a plurality of voices debating issues and policy logically in order to thrive. We can't let it become one party of power on the left and an easily demonized opposition party on the right, but with the Republican party falling apart... that's the way it seems to be going.
*Edited for grammar.