Re:Show HN: BitKeeper – Enterprise-ready version control, no...
by peatmoss on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @11:09AM
(#11676017)
> until you've had to use autotools or custom build a makefile for a half dozen different C compilers, kernels, libc, and so on, you don't know from POSIX "standards" pain.
Truer words have ne'er been spoken. My first big boy job involved building and maintaining a large open source stack on top of AIX. These days I occasionally experience hiccups related to OpenBSD not being Linux. Problems aren't even in the same league. That said, the thrill of getting stuff to work on AIX was certainly greater (and purchased with more human suffering).
Re:Show HN: BitKeeper – Enterprise-ready version control, no...
by qwertyuiop924 on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @12:41PM
(#11676861)
Ah, the agony that I can only imagine. The many Linux distros are bad enough...
Re:Show HN: BitKeeper – Enterprise-ready version control, no...
by qwertyuiop924 on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @08:06AM
(#11674452)
You know, I think you're right. You have a good point. Thanks.
And I'd love to have some real retro computers, but I've got no money, and most of the really interesting ones are from the UK. Ah well...
But now my beard is showing and I'm ranting. My point is this: it took something from completely outside of the commercial UNIX ecosystem, so far out in left field that none of the UNIX bosses (or Microsoft) saw it as a threat until it was far too late...and it took something that was good, really good in at least some regards, that it would have passionate fans even very early in. Linux did that. And, compared to everything else (pretty much everything else that's ever existed, IMHO), it's great.
And, I'm on board the retro computing bandwagon. I have a real live Commodore 64 and an Atari 130xe. I'd like to one day find an Amiga 1200 in good shape, but because I live in an RV and travel fulltime, I don't have a lot of room to spare. But I do like to tinker and reminisce.