Re:Show HN: BitKeeper – Enterprise-ready version control, no...
by clacke2 on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @03:50PM
(#11670075)
GPLv3 is Apache 2 compatible, which GPLv2 isn't. Most other permissive licenses are compatible with any GPL.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: BitKeeper – Enterprise-ready version control, no...
by gsylvie on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @01:05PM
(#11677075)
Most GPLv2 licensed software includes the clause "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." Through this mechanism a lot of GPL licensed software becomes compatible with Apache 2.
Also, replying to something a little higher in this thread, I wouldn't say that Apache 2 defines all contributions as Apache 2. That section of the license starts with the words "5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, ..."
And so Apache 2 just becomes the assumed default license on contributions, but it's not at all forced or required that contributions come in under Apache 2.