It's hard to argue that a car stopped at red light violates anyone's expectation of how a human would drive.
Here is one example. It is hard to be sure exactly what happened, because Google obviously phrases its accident reports to put its cars in as favorable light as possible.
"April 28, 2016: A Google self-driving prototype vehicle travelling westbound in autonomous mode on Nita Avenue in Palo Alto was involved in an accident. The prototype vehicle came to a stop at the intersection of San Antonio Road, then, prior to making a right turn on San Antonio Road, began to gradually advance forward in order to get a better view of traffic approaching from the left on San Antonio Road. When the prototype vehicle stopped in order to yield to traffic approaching from the left on San Antonio Road, a vehicle approaching at approximately 9 mph from behind the prototype collided with the rear bumper of the prototype vehicle."
http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en/...
The fact is: slow speed rear ends are really common. I've had them happen to me several times during one year where I commuted every day. I've done it myself on another car.
I would not be surprised if over the course of the next few years Google cars get rear-ended at light to moderate speeds hundreds of times.
About 23-30% of human accidents are rear end collisions. It is entirely possible that the car drives so well that other types of collisions are minimized.
That leaves rear-end collisions - the type the car can't control - misleadingly seeming to be abnormally high.
I was curious, so I went through the whole list. By my count, in the history of the program they've been involved in 19 accidents during autonomous operation, and the car was only at fault in one of those. [2] The majority of the other crashes were caused by other drivers rear-ending the car while it was stopped.
[1]: https://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar/reports/
[2]: http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/9/11186072/google-self-drivin...