News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by minimaxir on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:27PM (#11664095)
By sheer coincidence a research dataset containing OKCupid data was released today: https://osf.io/p9ixw/

I looked through it and it's very robust. I should have a few data visualizations up using it soon.

Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:28PM (#11664105)
thats fantastic, i will have to have a look, i imagine its a bit more organised than my quick scrape
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:42PM (#11664184)
give me an email i would love to see some more visualizations, what do you use?
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by minimaxir on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:46PM (#11664203)
I use R and ggplot2 for my visualizations (coincidentally those are also the tools used for the linked paper). Most of my visualizations are on my blog. (check HN profile)
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:53PM (#11664236)
Love the Taxi article!!
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by cshimmin on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @02:25AM (#11665482)
To the author: scientific notation (with only 2-3 digits of precision) would make most of this much more readable. Also avg and std deviation are usually more informative than avg + max. Or better yet just make a histogram (probably with log axes). Cool article!
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by _asummers on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:23PM (#11664071)
Totally not important to the content of the article, but to the author: your date line is broken. It's saying it was published on 2016-0-0, currently.
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:23PM (#11664076)
cheers fixing it now
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by bcherny on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:27PM (#11664099)
Are you saying 42% of profiles are empty? That would seem to indicate that OkCupid is really puffing up their MAU numbers.
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:33PM (#11664138)
yeah i noticed it a lot while checking profiles that there was just nothing written up at all. never really thought about it being a fake profile.
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by IndianAstronaut on Monday May 09, 2016 @08:08PM (#11664305)
Not Okcupid, but another dating site I went to had one profile message me. In her hobbies list it said "I really enjoy: NULL"
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by thevibesman on Monday May 09, 2016 @10:02PM (#11664727)
I've seen a few women* list a programing language in addition to other languages on online dating profiles.

* I'm sure there are some men that do it too, but I don't browse those profiles.

Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @08:14PM (#11664327)
could be fun to search the search the data for tech references :)
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @08:14PM (#11664326)
haha
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by serge2k on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:21PM (#11664060)
> My personal opinion is that profiles should be set as private by default as people don't often investigate the options they have, even i didnt realise my profile could be viewed publicly by the rest of the world.

It's a dating site.

Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by alex_doom on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:28PM (#11664102)
It always seems to be on any site where you have to create a profile, by default it'll be exposed to google.

I really wish there was a checkbox at the end of a registration form that said something like "Show Publicly". I'd wager most people would leave it unchecked.

Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:30PM (#11664115)
yeah it appears people including my self don't notice
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:23PM (#11664072)
yes it is, but it should be private when your logged out, its public to those who dont have an account on okcupid
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by minimaxir on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:27PM (#11664097)
To clarify, the default state is that the profile is available to logged-out users.
Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by parenthephobia on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:55PM (#11664246)
Is that worse than it being available to logged-in users?

Sure, you can't control what randoms on the Internet might look at your public profile, but you can't control who signs up for OKC accounts and looks at your private one, either.

Re:OkCupid,2.8M profiles out of 3.2M tested, open to all by ... by yakamok on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:31PM (#11664121)
Correct