What's the alternative? Google taking social backgrounds of certain areas into account when calculating routes? That sounds like a recipe for a discrimination scandal and public outcry - I can already see the headlines: "Don't want to be murdered? Google Maps with SafeNav now tells you which areas to avoid!"
Re:Death by GPS
by nickpsecurity on Monday May 09, 2016 @02:46AM
(#11658006)
Violent crime numbers being factored into pathfinding. Just like we do with videogames like StarCraft. That simple.
Re:Death by GPS
by lurker_primo on Monday May 09, 2016 @07:06AM
(#11658859)
I have a somewhat similar situation. There are three routes: A, B, and C from my home to work. A has a lot of intersections, which would mean more time spent in stops. It also has slower moving traffic due to narrower roads. B also has lots of intersections, but wider roads. Between A and B, depending on your luck, one of the routes might be faster.
C has very few intersections. But it has a 1 km stretch which takes 25 mins to cross if traffic is bad. Google maps always shows C to be the fastest. But local knowledge will tell you either A or B will be faster at peak traffic times.
> By Google Maps instructions they follow blindly into the worst areas. You might see it on TV but you heard it here first.
sounds very similar to the beginning to Bonfire of the Vanities
Re:Death by GPS
by nickpsecurity on Monday May 09, 2016 @11:57AM
(#11660778)
Darn. Not as original as I hoped. There's a Wikipedia entry for that where they take a wrong turn. I see what you're saying about the similarity. Yeah, that's the exact kind of thing I was thinking of. :)
Route 1: Turn left here, right here, right here, left here, highway here, odd roads here. 30 minutes.
Route 2: Get back on highway, drive a while, Interstate, drive a while, odd roads. 33 minutes.
Thing is, I recognized each street in route 1: The Hood(s) with about 300 cops a shift who can't keep up with the amount of stuff that goes down. The other was a straight, safe shot. I thought, "Is Google really trying to send me through all the worst areas of my city... areas where you have to stop right next to potential carjackers and killers... just to save three minutes?"
Now I know why people coming through think my city is just a shithole. It's a mix of great, good, OK, bad, and ugly but Google keeps sending people through The Hood. No wonder they think it's nothing but poverty and crime. So, then I got the idea for a movie or TV show where there's a serial killer that, SAW-style, makes people kill themselves. By Google Maps instructions they follow blindly into the worst areas. You might see it on TV but you heard it here first.
Yeah, don't trust the GPS's until they know the difference between an armed robbery and an Interstate. At the least, they need to realize we won't take that kind of risk unless we're talking about saving 30min to hours, the interview is too important for Interstate traffic, or she was one bad-ass lady. Not over three minutes, though. ;)