I feel it may be a problem for them since it looks like they try to reproduce the program's setup/workflow, which is (in my experience) more than bioinformatics reviewers usually do:

>Authors are strongly encouraged to include an automated test suite covering the core functionality of their software.

> OK: Documented manual steps that can be followed to check the expected functionality of the software (e.g. a sample input file to assert behaviour)

You can see the checklist reviewers go through in any of the issues here:

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues