News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Posix Abstractions in Modern Operating Systems: The Old, ... by majewsky on Sunday May 08, 2016 @02:26PM (#11655088)
> So you teach grep to take an IDL file, invoke an IDL compiler and dynamically load the parser for the protocol in question. Also, if the broker were a standardized, perhaps in-kernel component (dbus, kdbus), you could attach "idlgrep" to any process to trace its calls.

So you introduce a huge load of accidental complexity because the text interface has some perceived inefficiency? I'll choose simplicity and accessibility over this mess anytime.

Re:Posix Abstractions in Modern Operating Systems: The Old, ... by digi_owl on Monday May 09, 2016 @03:24AM (#11658119)
Ok, now i am confused. On the one hand you rail against complexity, while on the other you favor systemd.
Re:Posix Abstractions in Modern Operating Systems: The Old, ... by majewsky on Monday May 09, 2016 @05:24AM (#11658471)
Yes, systemd is complex. But much of its complexity is justified. I rail against unnecessary complexity.