News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The pressure that U.S. inequality exerts on parents by quicklyfrozen on Saturday May 07, 2016 @09:51PM (#11652220)
The difference is the tuition will be gone, but a house will still have its value. And since the house is in an area with a good school system, its value has probably risen :-).

It's certainly not a fair system.

Re:The pressure that U.S. inequality exerts on parents by burfog on Saturday May 07, 2016 @10:26PM (#11652331)
Short of assigning cities to people via lottery, there is no way to make schools equal. Good schools are made by having good people (students, parents) and good people will pay a premium to be among other good people.

The fairness depends on what "fair" means. You seem to think it would be fair for the people who create good schools (primarily by providing good students) to get stuck with mediocre schools. They put in all the extra value, but get nothing much in return. That doesn't seem fair to me.

Re:The pressure that U.S. inequality exerts on parents by aianus on Saturday May 07, 2016 @11:10PM (#11652449)
The mortgage interest on a million dollar home is more than private school tuition.
Re:The pressure that U.S. inequality exerts on parents by brians on Sunday May 08, 2016 @12:01AM (#11652550)
Many families buying these homes have several children. Property tax scales only loosely with family size, but tuition is typically linear.
Re:The pressure that U.S. inequality exerts on parents by quicklyfrozen on Sunday May 08, 2016 @12:24AM (#11652595)
Perhaps. Seems like the interest on an 800K loan would be about 30K in the first year, which is less then private school tuition around here. But you can't really compare the full amount as you've got to live somewhere, and you get a tax deduction as well.

And once you have 2 kids...