Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ...
by Tichy on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @12:19PM
(#1164560)
Don't have the patience to read the whole deletion policy page. Why would they want to delete such a thing? Is it inconceivable that some day somebody might stumble across the word "dwm" and look it up on Wikipedia?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ...
by gwern on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @08:50PM
(#1165853)
As it happens, I watch [[dwm]] and [[dmenu]], and when they went up earlier today, I did my usual searches. Turns out there are quite a few dwms, and all the ones in places like Google Books are not this dwm.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ...
by jessriedel on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @04:55PM
(#1165311)
People don't want Wikipedia to be dump for all possible information.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ...
by ars on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @10:01PM
(#1165996)
Yes they do.
Personally I want EVERYTHING in it, even if it's not notable, I don't care. The guideline should be: would 1 other (un-involved, un-related, etc) person on the planet be interested it? Then put it in.
I want to see a page on tips and techniques on laying brick, and page on the history of the coffee house down the corner from where you live. Everything.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ...
by postfuturist on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @06:26PM
(#1165556)
They are opposed to its encyclopedic nature?