Re:GNU name system
by nikolay on Friday May 06, 2016 @06:24AM
(#11642859)
Isn't GNUnet dead though? I'm been trying to set it up on a Mac for years and after spending hours without success, I've given up every single time. Even in Homebrew GNUnet is in the boneyard.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I just tried installing it on Debian. I couldn't figure out how it works within 10 seconds, and it made my CPU spike all the time that it was installed, so I just removed it. So, maybe it has usability problems. Its vital signs aren't great either. It seems to be the work of a single person, Christian Grothoff, although that person is still active handling bugs in Mantis.
Lots of svn commits, and I'm still cloning them into hg to get a sense for how development is progressing. There are 39k commits total. Takes a long time to grab them from svn. From an actual svn checkout without converting, I can see that there are many commits, several per day, but there hasn't been a release in two years. Maybe they need help with a release manager?
My overall feeling is that this is a very good idea that just needs better packaging.
its like hurd I'm guessing, nearly no one using it, so no reason to stop experimenting and having fun
Re:GNU name system
by canndrew2016 on Friday May 06, 2016 @10:36AM
(#11644252)
They recently got taken under the wing of Inria and have several people working on it full time.
GNUnet is pretty alive and has even a port that runs in the browser: https://github.com/amatus/gnunet-web (it actually works)
https://gnunet.io/ looks down from here, maybe due to the HN traffic.
I can't get it to work so it must not work. That's Mythbuster logic there.
Re:GNU name system
by justinlardinois on Sunday May 08, 2016 @04:49AM
(#11653260)
I read it more as "I can't get it to work so it's not worth my time." Which seems reasonable in this case.