I'd easily take 10M units at 10c profit a piece over 50k units at 70c profit.
Imagine your lunch costs 5c instead of $5... not everywhere has the same economic values.
Unless the US market has suddenly grown an appetite for Nigerian artists, I don't think it does.
Their primary target is Nigerians. Yet, the site's only means of payment is paypal. Paypal won't work for this market as the class of people they are targeting wouldn't have a credit card. Not all debit cards issued in that country works on paypal.
The country's e-commerce is in its infancy. Therefore, trust - especially with their fellow countryman with debit cards is currently low.
>offers users the ability to download music for ₦30 ($0.50)
50 cents is not ₦30. It's ₦99.49 according to Google. At this price, it's hard to see them succeeding because a pirated mp3 disc containing as many songs as the disc can fit is priced at ₦200 and sometimes less. http://www.nairaland.com/125619/why-buy-pirated-cds-it
Additionally, they aren't really bringing anything new to the table apart from a fee and legality. There are lots of blogs where people can download songs in a single click at high quality and with cover art and some of the tags intact.
I just don't see this working. Even their target wouldn't mind paying ₦100 for a song, most would't be able to buy. If they really want to hit it big, they should solve the payment issue instead.
A disc won't do you any good when all you have is a phone.
Sure, it's not as convenient as spotify, but just as in western world you can charge people a few bucks for extra convenience, in the developing world people will usually take awkward steps to avoid paying multiple dollars.
Distribution is a solved problem. The value adds are really in the surrounding services, such as dashboards that show sales trends etc. These BI applications aren't traditionally startup friendly. I'd be very surprised if any startup were able to not only disrupt this industry, but make money doing it.
[1]: http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-signs-bmg-deal-...
I can't tell from the article if the story has relevance to the USA market. If record companies today can get $0.70 cut from Apple for a $0.99 song on iTunes, it doesn't look like they'd take less than $0.50 from a startup.
Last I checked, Amazon Music downloads is also 70/30 split for 99 cent songs.
>The team invested a lot of time [...], while mending those with record labels and artist management companies.
My notes to any programmer that's interested in selling music for 50 cents or less:
Before investing a ton of time writing any code, get on the phone with the Big 3 record labels Universal+Warner+Sony. See if you can get favorable licensing terms so that they'll take $0.35 and let you keep $0.15. I'm skeptical you'll get such terms because Spotify/Pandora tried to get better terms so they could turn a profit. They couldn't make it happen. Maybe you have better negotiation skills and charm than the Spotify executives. Napster's Shawn Fanning & Sean Parker didn't have the business chops to wheel & deal with record labels but Apple's Steve Jobs did.