News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by maurycy on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @08:33AM (#1164023)
Out of curiosity, are there any Wikipedia forks?

*BSD guys had a lot of similar arguments and they ended up with many flavors of BSD (OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, DragonFlyBSD etc.)

Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by moeffju on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @09:26AM (#1164123)
There is the Levitation Project which attempts to port Mediawiki to a Git backend. It was spawned out of pretty much this very same discussion in the German Wikipedia.

http://levit.at/ion/wiki/Main_Page

Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by Perceval on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @04:25PM (#1165214)
Larry Sanger (co-creator of Nupedia and Wikipedia) forked it into Citizendium in an attempt to re-infuse a healthy respect for elite, specialist, academic, or otherwise expert knowledge. Hasn't really taken off and Larry Sanger is now emeritus.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by eru on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @09:15AM (#1164099)
Some spammers mirror it.. But that's about it.

If you can work out a good way to share most edits between the forks --- because most edits won't be a source of argument --- then you have a fighting chance.

Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by joeyo on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @12:10PM (#1164539)
It could be as simple as mirroring wikipedia but never propagating the deletions. Trying to edit an article would redirect one to wikipedia; trying to edit a deleted article would instead edit the local copy (in the event of the article being recreated on wikipedia at a later date there could be an automatic upstream merge).
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by eru on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @01:14PM (#1164681)
This might be a good start. Though you will also want to keep links to the deleted articles alive.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by Perceval on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @04:29PM (#1165238)
If you took half a second to look through the "New pages" feed, and saw not only the hideous quality and dubious nature of nearly all newly created pages, but also the vast quantity of new articles created every few minutes, you might rethink your position on keeping all deleted articles. Many new articles deserve speedy deletion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:NewPages

Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by joeyo on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @05:16PM (#1165367)
Ok, so only add pages to the mirror that are older than N days or have more than M (non-reverted) edits. Probably you'd also need to have tracking for when page names change. It's not a deal-breaker.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by joeyo on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @05:26PM (#1165401)
That's a good point. I'll have to think about this.
Re:Father of the moderm tiling WMs proposed for deletion in ... by cabalamat on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @02:15PM (#1164836)
I started an inclusionist fork called includipedia -- http://www.includipedia.com/ -- though I've not developed it fully.