Re:It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)
by kelukelugames on Friday May 06, 2016 @12:11AM
(#11641641)
You write a lot for someone who could care less and isn't offended.
And you analyse people's souls a lot for someone who is not a psychiatrist.
I'm just chatty. I write a lot for every topic I'm interested in, as you can plainly see from my comment backlog.
Doesn't need to be offended on behalf of Adams to respond -- I'm just the kind of person that doesn't let an inconsistent argument slip by. And I saw "Adams is XXX because he said YYY is OK" without YYY being either bad or any justification for the XXX.
Re:It's Charisma, Stupid (2004)
by kelukelugames on Friday May 06, 2016 @11:50AM
(#11644751)
Yeeeeesh, over analyzing Internet comments. You must be fun at parties.
If by reader you mean someone who read his blog maybe 4-5 times total in the last 10 years (and doesn't even own any Dilbert book), then, still no (ie., no I was not offended).
I made a statement concerning the lack of any practical proof/content in the comment.
As I said, he may very well be a weasel (and I could not care less, I might add) but that's not something that's concluded from the contents of the comment.