News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by Hopka on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @06:12AM (#1163857)
It's also interesting what the company says in return: http://www.smithfieldfoods.com/RollingStone/
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by alecco on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @07:02AM (#1163907)
A couple of for-show plants in US to cover the madness in now exported to Mexico and other countries with lax or unenforced pollution laws.

Remember the original swine flu? Not the 2009 H1N1 human outbreak, the ones before that killing vast numbers of pigs in industrial farms.

Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by mmaunder on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @06:42AM (#1163881)
If the article is incorrect then Smithfield can and should sue Rolling Stone for libel. But they're not going to because it's true.
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by toothcomb on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @08:18AM (#1164000)
It's what they don't deny that still worries me. I was hoping that the family being consumed by the lagoon was a non truth. I read it as tragic comedy (shame on me)
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by astine on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @08:50AM (#1164051)
It's weirdly like that scene out of the Jungle where the guy falls in the lard pit and becomes part of the product.
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by viggity on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @02:21PM (#1164863)
They contest 29 different assertions made by the rolling stones author. What didn't they deny?
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by Confusion on Thursday March 04, 2010 @04:48AM (#1166545)
What kind of position is that?! Someone accused you of wrongdoing and the only valid defense is suing the other? What happened to correcting each other? Accepting that misinterpretations and mistakes are human?
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by viggity on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @02:04PM (#1164812)
The want the whole thing to go away, even if you're in the right, a lot of times it isn't worth suing. Look at Barbra Streisand - some dude took pictures of her beach house, she was upset and sued him over it. So instead of the handful of people seeing the photos, the law suit hit all the news stations and tens of thousands of people saw the pictures.
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by danparsonson on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @06:56AM (#1163897)
For further comparison, BBC article about the Polish farms operated by the same company here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4035081.stm.
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by helium on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @08:20AM (#1164006)
Hmm. Why don't they let someone come film a random(typical) hog farm to document the conditions?
Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by malte on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @09:06AM (#1164080)
A few weeks ago, German newscasts aired some footage secretly recorded from a poultry farm that was a major supplier of one of the biggest (and well-known) meat processors in Germany.

The material really was disgusting: workers beating animals to death, throwing transportation boxes (thus, breaking the animals' bones) etc.

I'm not a hardliner-PETA-animal-rights-activist, but I think there is good reason to not naively believe those statements of companies like Smithfield.

Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by d_c on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @11:56AM (#1164502)
You can find the video here, the show that ran it is called "Report Mainz" (Mainz is the name of a town).

http://translate.google.de/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl...

Re:Pork's Dirty Secret (2006) by toothcomb on Wednesday March 03, 2010 @09:46AM (#1164167)
That's sad, I hope that these are the extreme or the one offs, just as I hope you tube comments aren't representative of real people's views.

Either way it doesn't make it alright.