Re:Feds announce final e-cigarette rule that nearly bans them
by developer2 on Thursday May 05, 2016 @06:54PM
(#11640310)
The very fact that there are flavoured vapors that smell up an entire room with their disgustingly sweet scents is enough to ban them indoors. I don't want your strawberry cloud in my face. Imagine 20+ people in a closed space all dispersing their various scented vapors. No thanks. It would not be considered acceptable for someone to burn incense in most indoors locations; this is no different in that regard, and may be worse.
Re:Feds announce final e-cigarette rule that nearly bans them
by Tiksi on Thursday May 05, 2016 @07:46PM
(#11640593)
Should we ban spray on deodorant and perfume too? I find axe particularly offensive and a few perfumes too.
Re:Feds announce final e-cigarette rule that nearly bans them
by developer2 on Thursday May 05, 2016 @09:11PM
(#11640991)
People that overuse deserve to be talked to and asked to tone it down. I've seen a couple of instances of this in my time and it works, as most people are a little embarrassed to learn that their perfume/cologne/body spray is that pungent. Fair enough, considering that once you've used the same scent for months on end, you barely smell it on yourself anymore. Sometimes it takes a gentle nudge to inform.
And yes, if once talked to, someone continues to bathe themselves in scents that gag other people, they need to be let go. The flagrant disrespect for people who have to be around you for 8 hours a day is too much.
Re:Feds announce final e-cigarette rule that nearly bans them
by ttrmw on Friday May 06, 2016 @06:48AM
(#11642953)
Indeed, and I think the same is true of vaping. If you're blowing obnoxious clouds indoors, sure, you should be asked to stop and, on refusing, ejected. This, as with the fragrance example, does not require regulation.
Re:Feds announce final e-cigarette rule that nearly bans them
by ubercore on Thursday May 05, 2016 @03:30PM
(#11639036)
More than not wanting the vapor, it's respecting that others may have that concern in a public space, as irrational as it may seem to you. I think common sense would extend e-cigs to a "no smoking" area.
> The emissions discharge water, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nicotine into indoor air at levels far lower than found with tobacco cigarettes (Schripp et al., 2013).
http://www.treatobacco.net/en/page_528.php
In addition, e-cigarettes dont always have nicotine and often have lower amounts than cigarettes. Further making the fear of momentarily sitting near someone smoking an e-cigarette outside almost irrational in terms of health risks.
In terms of not wanting vapor being blown in your face, then I agree there is a social etiquette that should be respected.