Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by refurb on Thursday May 05, 2016 @01:42PM
(#11638194)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
Now, there is a delay (1 year?) between when it's published in a journal and when it's freely released, which I can understand bothers people, but it does eventually make it's way out to the public domain.
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by morgante on Thursday May 05, 2016 @02:04PM
(#11638397)
This seems to be only NIH-funded medical research. While it's nice to see, that's far from the only federally funded research.
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by refurb on Thursday May 05, 2016 @08:26PM
(#11640790)
It was expanded back in 2013 to all federal organizations that spend more than $100M in research.
That was just an example link.
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by rsfern on Friday May 06, 2016 @12:59AM
(#11641787)
It was not expanded. i think you're referring to the FASTR bill that has not yet (but hopefully will soon be) passed.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Access_to_Science_and_T...
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by tmptmp on Friday May 06, 2016 @12:11AM
(#11641642)
>>It was expanded back in 2013 to all federal organizations that spend more than $100M in research.
Why some arbitrary figure like $100M? why not $1M or $1K or for that matter even $1?
It should be other way round, if any research gets any funding (even $1 or 1 cent) then also the papers coming out of that research should be immediately released to public else they should not accept that grant/funding. The journals should not get a free ride for 1 year or so.
It does? I'm genuinely curious. The vast majority of research is funded with public money (to some extent).
Where is all this publicly-funded research published?