Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by lake99 on Thursday May 05, 2016 @10:45AM
(#11636524)
> If it does, it becomes an ethical maxim to use Tor.
This is one of the reasons I use Tor. If there is such a list, I want it to be full of people doing ordinary stuff. In effect, I want the list to be useless.
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by NoGravitas on Thursday May 05, 2016 @01:21PM
(#11638016)
Indeed, this is the main reason I'm using Signal (and badgering my friends into using it). I want to increase the volume of encrypted non-sensitive stuff, so that the "list" doesn't have predictive value.
Re:Elsevier Complaint Shuts Down Sci-Hub Domain Name
by wolfgke on Thursday May 05, 2016 @06:12PM
(#11640057)
Having metadata (i.e. who communicates with who at which time etc.) still has lots of value for the three-letter agencies (some even say it's even more important then the content of the messages itself). As far as I know Signal does nothing to avoid this kind of metadata (but please correct me if I'm wrong).
If it does, it becomes an ethical maxim to use Tor. If it doesn't, then you can simply use Tor. So by case analysis you should use Tor.