Re:London may elect it's first Muslim mayor
by lucozade on Thursday May 05, 2016 @06:01AM
(#11634892)
> London may elect it's first Muslim mayor
That's the first sentence in the piece. Complete with grammatical inexactitude.
Although, in fairness, that's not the worst bit of English in the article.
I'm quite interested in knowing why this is on HN front page. Not because the lack of tech or VC in the subject matter, just that it's so dreadfully poor and content light.
Re:London may elect it's first Muslim mayor
by SideburnsOfDoom on Thursday May 05, 2016 @06:20AM
(#11634954)
> I'm quite interested in knowing why this is on HN front page. Not because the lack of tech or VC in the subject matter, just that it's so dreadfully poor and content light.
reply
Possibly helped to the front page by it being morning in the UK when it appeared - right in time for people to check HN before the working day.
I agree that it's a content-light article, so post what you find to be better links in the comments - I have.
Agreed. However, if you're going to correct someone's grammar on the Internet, may I suggest that you use correct grammar yourself, per http://grammarist.com/usage/as-per/.
Re:London may elect it's first Muslim mayor
by KON_Air on Thursday May 05, 2016 @06:02AM
(#11634896)
I be capital too since "it" refers to London?
Re:London may elect it's first Muslim mayor
by SideburnsOfDoom on Thursday May 05, 2016 @05:58AM
(#11634882)
Done
The original headline is "Londoners Could Elect City's First Muslim Mayor" If you're going to change it, may I suggest "its" not it's" as in http://grammarist.com/spelling/its-its/
(edit I see that's the verbatim subheading of the original article. Still not a great choice)
Sadiq Khan (Labour) is leading in the polls, with Zac Goldsmith (Conservative) running second.