News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP. Parent comment

Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by fintuple on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:07PM (#11632309)
My point is that it DOES. My single statement assertion was making that implicit assertion...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by dimino on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:10PM (#11632339)
Why do you think you know more than they do about this?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by fintuple on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:40PM (#11632521)
I am simply expressing my preference and opinion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by dimino on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:43PM (#11632548)
Yes, and I'm asking what reasons you have for holding that opinion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by fintuple on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @07:22PM (#11632781)
Why don't you take a look at the state of npm
[ Parent | on HN ]