News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by nextos on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @03:14PM (#11630894)
I think he doesn't necessarily imply anything about being high or low in the chain. But about beauty and understanding.

SICP is one example, but I bet it's even possible to be happy coding GUIs or any other rather mundane things if one does it with an elegant toolset. For example, Oz comes to mind.

Some modern tools are not pleasing to use, often because architectures are a mess. Things move forward too quickly.

Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by monknomo on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @05:15PM (#11631898)
What's Oz?
Re:Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP by carapace on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @05:21PM (#11631949)