News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nine years of censorship by chris_wot on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:55PM (#11630721)
I'd rather the reporter heard it from someone who truly understood the science.
Re:Nine years of censorship by evgen on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @03:48PM (#11631162)
You seem to rather delusionally believe that a modern reporter would know the difference.
Re:Nine years of censorship by chris_wot on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @03:51PM (#11631180)
I'm not following. The difference between what?
Re:Nine years of censorship by evgen on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @04:00PM (#11631259)
Modern science reporters have repeatedly shown themselves incapable of recognizing good science from bad science, so why would they start now and be able to recognize good scientific sources from PR-seeking frauds?