Nine years of censorship

Re:Nine years of censorship by Swizec on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:49PM (#11630677)

I think it instead assumes that journalists will do anything to sell more papers. Regardless of what the scientists actually say.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nine years of censorship by chris_wot on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:52PM (#11630700)

So a media officer won't do any good then.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nine years of censorship by evgen on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @03:50PM (#11631175)

Actually it can, because if the media officer becomes the gateway then the reporters are forced into an iterated game with someone who knows them compared to ranging the herd of scientists looking for PR and hoping to pick off the weak and inexperienced.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nine years of censorship by chris_wot on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @03:53PM (#11631206)

If they are that interested in reporting a slanted story, a media officer isn't going to help.

[ Parent | on HN ]