ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by neap24 on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @11:16AM (#11628929)

I disagree slightly. Mostly because you can find dozens of commentaries and critical analyses of great works of fiction to complement your reading. These are essentially transmitting the same info a knowledgeable teacher/group of classmates would. The resources for math and science are also vast, but often require access to specialized laborites/equipment at the upper levels.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by ethanbond on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @12:18PM (#11629402)

Uhh... no they're not "essentially the same." The value of being in the same room as knowledgeable people is interacting with them. If there's something that is unclear or that you want to delve into, you have an interactive way to do so.

This whole "self-learning is just as good!" is ridiculous. If it was, it would already rule the world. People trust accreditation for a reason.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by xiaoma on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @12:38PM (#11629554)

It already does rule the world. The greatest writers, actors, musicians, engineers, salespeople, marketers and entrepreneurs nearly all mastered their craft outside of brick an mortar institutions

You have a PHD in drama? Good for you. I'd rather watch a high school drop out like Leonardo DiCaprio.

You have a PHD in computer graphics? That's nice, but once again a dropout beat you to it. He currently leads Oculus Rift.

Marketers? Salespeople? Businesspeople? Authors? Seriously... try to name even one at the very top of the game who became that way through formal schooling. It's not easy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by ethanbond on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:07PM (#11632317)

Oh good, so all you have to do is be a prodigy!

Sure, maybe the top 1% is self-taught (probably not, though, you're just selecting for your point). How about the next 15%?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by xiaoma on Thursday May 05, 2016 @05:22AM (#11634781)

My comment was not a guide on how you can "rule the world", in your words. I was simply pointing out that those at the very top are "self-learning".

The examples I gave should make it incredibly clear that people can and do learn enough to get to the top of their fields without going through a formal process. It doesn't mean that you will. It doesn't mean that there are no fields with rigid credential requirements. It does mean that no formal body controls education, only schooling and credentials.

>"Sure, maybe the top 1% is self-taught (probably not, though, you're just selecting for your point)."

Another thing to think about is that with or without credentials in their past, at the very top everybody is self-taught. No business school on earth can teach Zuckerberg exactly how to set Facebook's strategy. He's got to make his own curriculum.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ROI on a college degree depends what you study, not where by basch on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:05PM (#11630302)

At the same time, I can interact with the web.

I can google questions, I can read discussions that take place between other people, I can chime in, I can be replied to.

I would probably find it more useful to be able to read all the TOP QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS from all the Roman History 101 discussions around the world, than just whatever came up in my class. Being able to sort by global best as opposed to local loudest sounds very useful.

[ Parent | on HN ]