News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Record Bid Set for World's Cheapest Solar, Undercutti... by dragontamer on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @10:53AM (#11628735)
> Yes, solar can help meet peak load during the summer, but not the rest of the year and it causes stress on the system by requiring a lot of power to spin up to meet demand and solar decreases.

Note that Solar isn't "hurting". Because such demand right now is being covered by Natural Gas Peaker Plants anyway.

Natural Gas Peaker plants are expensive, so if we can replace some of their usage with other energy sources, that'd be great. Eventually, we might be able to transition off of them with sufficiently advanced energy storage technologies.

Re:New Record Bid Set for World's Cheapest Solar, Undercutti... by rhino369 on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:08PM (#11630330)
But solar would increase the need for peaker plants if it starts replacing baseload power needs. We are a long ways off from that, but it will limit the usage of solar until solar drops below the marginal cost for natural gas usage.
Re:New Record Bid Set for World's Cheapest Solar, Undercutti... by dragontamer on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @05:18PM (#11631923)
I'd say lets cross that bridge when we get there. Solar is a very long way from replacing baseload power.

And once baseload power starts getting "replaced", we enter the realm of coal plants and nuclear plants reconditioning themselves so that they can be scaled up and down a bit better.

I know both coal and nuclear power require many minutes to change their energy production, but if a smaller-scale energy storage (~30 minutes) can be created to hold out during the scaling up / down period, the problem could be solved.

As opposed to say, load-shifting pure solar energy (which requires a storage capacity measured in hours, not minutes). High power / low time can be solved with standard Lead Acid batteries or maybe Flywheels (cheaper technology than Lithium Ion, which would be better for hours of storage)