News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by pavlov on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:04AM (#11628001)
If "no more growth" is going to be Apple's story to investors, the company needs to start paying a much bigger dividend.
Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by acqq on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:08AM (#11628021)
Can you please elaborate, let's say, comparing AAPL with MSFT as an example?

http://www.streetinsider.com/dividend_history.php?q=aapl

http://www.streetinsider.com/dividend_history.php?q=msft

Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by osweiller on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:16AM (#11628049)
If you exclude the cash horde (edit - the zombies hired to protect the vault full of cash), Apple's P/E ratio is running at around 5 right now. IBM is 10. Microsoft is about 35 if excluding their much smaller cash pile.

Apple is ridiculously "undervalued" compared to any peer in the industry. It is a money printing colossus.

Having said that, the market seems to get shivers around $600B, and that psychological barrier imposes a friction that makes the rules of the game change. No one can stay above that for long, and in the case of Apple its profoundly out of scale numbers makes everyone simply put it in a different universe of valuation.

Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by flurpitude on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:46AM (#11628273)
*hoard. Horde is zombies.
Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by MollyR on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @10:02AM (#11628401)
Is that really the whole story ? http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-isnt-really-sitting-o... I honestly don't know and am interested in what you think of this article.
Re:Apple is now run by a guy who is more like John Sculley t... by osweiller on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @10:23AM (#11628548)
That is an interesting article, but the meat of it contradicts, in a common sense, the title.

For instance, no one thinks that Apple has a big vault with hundreds of billions in it. Like all rational players, they hold most of their negotiables in short term securities. For tax reasons they also have been taking on debt in some areas rather than liberate cash from elsewhere.

But they have an enormous, enormous amount of wealth sitting virtually at a standstill. They have announced that they're going to spend a lot of it to buy back shares (boosting the value of the remaining shares), but they've been doing this so slowly they're adding to their pile quicker than they're spending it.