Everything makes sense if David Kleiman was Satoshi Nakamoto. Here’s why

Re:Everything makes sense if David Kleiman was Satoshi Nakam... by jl6 on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @06:56AM (#11627458)

How much do we believe that the Dorian Nakamoto denial comment on p2pfoundation was from the real Satoshi?

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-sour...

Because that was posted in 2014, and Kleiman died in 2013.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything makes sense if David Kleiman was Satoshi Nakam... by medlazik on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @07:30AM (#11627586)

Not him

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/xn/detail/2003008:Comment:5527...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=775174.0

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything makes sense if David Kleiman was Satoshi Nakam... by needs on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @07:35AM (#11627605)

[email protected] expired somewhere in 2011~2012 (gmx remove account within one year of inactivity), and someone immediately took it, and then used it to take control of Satoshi's account on p2pfoundation and bitcointalk.

But even without knowing that, Satoshi had no reasons at the time to came back just to say that one particular guy was not him, just on p2pfoundation and without any kind of proof.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything makes sense if David Kleiman was Satoshi Nakam... by okket on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @07:30AM (#11627587)

There is the theory that Kleiman and Wright worked together, but it has a lot of Wright bias...

http://gizmodo.com/this-australian-says-he-and-his-dead-frie...

[Edit: This seems to be refuted, I leave it here for documentation]

[ Parent | on HN ]