News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The cryptographically provable con man. Parent comment

Re:The cryptographically provable con man by nurettin on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @01:28AM (#11626412)
Serious discussions with priors that could lead to anyone claiming to be anyone and ending up being someone else on closer inspection?

May I have a link for that?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The cryptographically provable con man by spacehome on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:37PM (#11633355)
Sure there's a prior for that, as 0 and 1 are not probabilities.
[ Parent | on HN ]