News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by cjbprime on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @11:28PM (#11625957)
Wow. What's the intuition for why python on top of libuv is 2x faster than node on top of libuv?
Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by 1st1 on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @11:39PM (#11626001)
Two things I'd check first:

1. The benchmarks make servers generate a huge number of objects, so maybe, the GC is under too much pressure.

2. Another possibility is that the v8 JIT can't optimize some JS code in nodejs, or does a poor job.

That said, only careful profiling can answer your question :)

Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by geekuillaume on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @12:41AM (#11626241)
I would be interested in seeing the performance difference in NodeJS TCP echo benchmark by using piping instead of reading/writing manually:

  socket.pipe(socket);
Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by occasionalreedr on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @05:18PM (#11631924)
C Python uses ref counting, whereas Node/V8 uses GC. Ref counting schemes generally use much less memory and GC scans can be expensive when there's a lot of new data, as is the case for a web server.
Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by fzaninotto on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:52AM (#11626659)
How about clustering the Node server? By default, node uses only one process. Making the server use all available processes requires a bit more work (see https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/cluster.html or https://github.com/Unitech/pm2) but will probably do more justice to Node.js vs Python.
Re:Uvloop: Fast Python networking by 1st1 on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @02:56AM (#11626682)
> but will probably do more justice to Node.js vs Python.

How so? Clustering for node just makes it run in several OS processes. You can (and should) do the same for Python code, it's easy.