Re:The cryptographically provable con man
by MertsA on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @11:27PM
(#11625948)
Someone posted on his P2P Foundation account back in March 2014 during the Dorian Nakamoto fiasco. I'd think it's very unlikely at best that Kleiman is Satoshi based on that alone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That account was later found to be compromised. It wasn't clear when the compromise took place, but quite possibly was before the email you mention was sent. See http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/09/16/satoshi-n....