News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The cryptographically provable con man by dakami on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @11:19PM (#11625916)
Everything before Bitcoin was really obsessed with anonymity, whereas Bitcoin was actually scared of centralization.
Re:The cryptographically provable con man by rdl on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @09:14AM (#11628042)
Not everything (hashcash, some of Wei Dai's stuff, etc.) -- but I was more referring to how to do tests/proofs in mutually-distrustful environments, not the protocols themselves.

Bitcoin was exceptional in a lot of ways -- most importantly, getting traction! -- decentralization, the ramping up, etc.

Re:The cryptographically provable con man by dakami on Thursday May 05, 2016 @12:22AM (#11633995)
I'm interested in more of your perspective here. I was around back in the Mojo Nation era as something of an observer, but there's lots maybe I didn't see.
Re:The cryptographically provable con man by rdl on Friday May 06, 2016 @04:24AM (#11642483)
The good stuff was always buried deeply on threads, and mainly pre 1996. I should do something better with the archives to pull out the specific good stuff.