Re:Johnson and Johnson hit with $55M damages in talc cancer ...
by ars on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @08:15PM
(#11625277)
> but turned their marketing to groups less likely to know about it
It does appear that way, but it's not true. The marketing was simply toward those who buy it more often that's all.
Knowingly selling a dangerous product is bad enough (it says not to inhale the dust - how exactly are you supposed to use it without making dust?), but let's not criticize them for things that are not real.
It does appear that way, but it's not true. The marketing was simply toward those who buy it more often that's all.
Knowingly selling a dangerous product is bad enough (it says not to inhale the dust - how exactly are you supposed to use it without making dust?), but let's not criticize them for things that are not real.