News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Validating Satoshi (Or Not). Parent comment

Re:Validating Satoshi (Or Not) by viraptor on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @09:03AM (#11620192)
The sceptics claim one thing - he didn't provide any proof. The information he provided is intentionally misleading. (and this is something you can verify yourself)

Why should we waste any time to consider whether he is or isn't the right person? The situation did not change from 2 days ago apart from him being more of an ass.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Validating Satoshi (Or Not) by blowski on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @09:27AM (#11620391)
If I want to waste my time, then it's my time to waste. If you don't want to waste your time, then don't.

I believe it's worth wasting my time because two of the leading people involved in Bitcoin, as well as two leading news organisations, have all reported on this so it's interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Validating Satoshi (Or Not) by viraptor on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @09:02PM (#11625456)
Leading news orgs still report on Trump, so that's a low bar ;) I'd recommend looking at people who actually tried to dissect and reproduce the proof instead.
[ Parent | on HN ]