News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:As venture capital dries up, tech startups discover fruga... by zeemonkee3 on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @08:30AM (#11619939)
"Rewriting something to reduce technical debt" is the kind of nuclear option you would use if you had money - or developer hours - to burn.

Technical debt is better managed through gradual refactoring as part of the normal development processes. Of course there's still going to be a struggle between taking time to maintain code quality and sales wanting the next feature yesterday, but it's a different argument than "we want to rewrite this in shiny new framework X because someone on Hacker News said so" (not that this exact argument will be used, of course).

Automation I'd see more as a sensible move, if it reduces costs in the long term. Again it may take a back seat to short term priorities, particularly when cash is short.

Re:As venture capital dries up, tech startups discover fruga... by leetrout on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @08:46AM (#11620063)
Yes, indeed, I agree with all your points. And in pretty much all cases I would opt for "gradual refactoring" (and hopefully with lots of tests before starting).
Re:As venture capital dries up, tech startups discover fruga... by ArkyBeagle on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @12:51PM (#11622286)
What's fun is when bitrot in the automation sets in. It's hard to gauge the long term liability of it.