News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A cache miss is not a cache miss. Parent comment

Re:A cache miss is not a cache miss by matt_d on Monday May 02, 2016 @10:46PM (#11617474)
This discussion reminded me of a formula for calculating the average cost of a cache miss in this pretty cool paper ("An Analysis of the Effects of Miss Clustering on the Cost of a Cache Miss").

In particular, see Equation 4: http://researcher.ibm.com/files/us-viji/miss-cluster.pdf

[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.